The Future of [Experimental Particle] Physics in the Times
I was impressed (like Mark Trodden) by the lovely pictures, good PR, and even some lyrical prose on CERN’s coming Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in the New York Times. But I was annoyed by this statement:
For the past generation, physics has been in something of a rut. There have been plenty of findings from smaller colliders, but the results have mostly been expected.There’s more to physics than just experimental particle physics: cosmology, for example, which has certainly not been in a rut (and let’s hope we’re not about to get into one).
Subscribe to my feed.
Comments
Andrew
an argument could be made that particle physics and cosmology are in fact in a very similar state - standard models defined by exquisitely measured parameters that really can't go much further, but with fundamental things completely unexplained - where do those quark masses come from ? what is the vacuum energy ? Some grand theory awaits .. but meanwhile we are running up against a brick wall.
Contrast this with other areas of physics - quantum optics, extrasolar planets, soft condensed matter - which are still a mess, but at least there are still surprises ...
Posted by: Andy Lawrence | January 19, 2007 1:10 PM